To catch a glimpse of these tightly interwoven material flows, let’s look at the paper of Migrant Journal’s cover. It is called Colorplan, distributed by the British company G.F Smith and produced by James Cropper, a market-listed company with factories in Great Britain, the United States and China. Colorplan consists of roughly 95% cellulose, which is extracted from wood. To achieve the specific material qualities that make Colorplan unique eight different types of wood are required. Namely, Spruce, Pine, Birch, Aspen and four species of Eucalyptus (Globulus, Grandis, Dunnii, Maidenii). The respective trees are cut in the far-away forests of Sweden, Finland, Spain, Portugal, Uruguay, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, Russia, Poland, and Denmark. Right after being cut they are loaded on transporters and brought to the local wood chipper who removes their bark and chops them into neat sub-rectangular woodchips with a typical length of five to fifty millimeters. Next, the highly coveted material is transported with trucks, cargo-trains or epic woodchip carriers from the twelve aforementioned countries to one of the pulp mills James Cropper is collaborating with, for example to Lappeenranta in Finland or to Mönsterås in Sweden. In these small Scandinavian villages, we find huge chemical factories that are specialized in the extraction of cellulose fibers from wood, a technique called Kraft process. There, our eclectic mélange of international woodchips undergoes a complicated chemical procedure involving head spinning high chimneys, massive chemical bathtubs and totally incomprehensible process charts. Apparently, some of these things happen there: washing, soaking, scanning, chipping and rechipping, steaming, pulping, cooking, pressuring and bleaching. The woodchips have to spend several hours in a thing called digester. We haven’t heard anything about the involved chemicals before (sodium hydroxide, sodium sulfide, ammonium sulphite, potassium, etc.) but after analyzing their production chains we can report that we should add China, the United States, Canada, Russia and Belarus to the supply chain of Migrant Journal. In fact, we could add China und the U.S. twice because the final, pure and bright cellulose fibers are transported in stainless steel tanks, a material that is sourced from these two countries and helps to avoid iron contamination of Colorplan paper.
After these cellulose fibers had their chemical catharsis in Scandinavia, they travel via ship and truck to the paper mill of James Cropper in Kendal, Northwest England where they are transformed into their desired final form. For this purpose, the natural force of thousands of liters of water is redirected from the nearby river Kent to soak a bulk of cellulose fibers. Once slushy and squishy, the fibers are mixed with a bunch of adhesives and chemicals. The exact compound is top-secret because it will lead to the unique structure, elasticity and feel of Colorplan that creates its Unique Selling Proposition on the global paper market. We don’t know a lot about the details of this process but one thing we can reveal is that particles of styrene and maleic anhydride (i.e. plastic) are applied. These substances derive from an intense chemical workout in the United States and Germany but are based on the good old liquids of oil and natural gas (in this case mainly extracted from the Middle East, South America and the U.S.). After some more drying we are almost done. The final cherry on the paper cake comes in the form of chalk, starch or polyvinyl alcohol. The latter is another kind of plastic that is manufactured in China and the United States. Its main purpose is to ‘close’ the paper before it gets ready for transport, meaning that it gets rolled on cable drums of superhuman size that are up to three meters in diameter and weigh more than four tons. But since we never need more than 150 kilograms for our usual cute print-run of 3.000 copies James Cropper simply sends a pallet of Colorplan in the back of a DHL-truck to our printer in Pliezhausen.
*
And this is only Migrant Journal’s cover. Its global flow of materials triggers forces that extract resources, rearrange substances, channel energy, alter landscapes and redirect rivers. Needless to say, that all of Migrant Journal’s components—like glue, ink, pigments, threads, special metallic colors, packaging etc.—and their supply chains could be unraveled and analyzed this way. But watch out, because if we continue to trace the hidden flows of materials that enable Migrant Journal to live, we might bump into a couple of unwelcome social, political and economic consequences.
For a starter, we make great use of crude oil, probably not the most environmentally friendly substance.
It is used to produce the fuel for the cargo ships, trucks and planes that transport our materials.
It is used to produce the plastic particles that strengthen our paper.
It is used for the liquid component in our inks.
And of course, it is also used for the first thing you see when you open the cardboard envelope after delivery: a plastic wrapping that protects our journal. Is it controversial that we have criticized the methods and consequences of oil extraction in several articles of Migrant Journal while at the same time the journal wouldn’t exist without it?
At the same time, the factories, ships, planes and trucks in our supply chain burn wood, petrol or gas to power their engines, which emit a lot of carbon dioxide. For example, the German paper mill producing our inside paper (called ProfiBulk), states that it emits more than eight tons of CO2 for the 20,000 copies of Migrant Journal we have produced in total. This is the equivalent of roughly 30 flights from Dusseldorf to London but unfortunately represents just a tiny part of our production chain. Let’s not forget to add the emissions from several other factories and an armada of means of transportation to this calculation.
The unraveling of our supply chains also revealed that most of our materials are produced, distributed and sold by multinational companies. For example, the US-based chemical giant Huntsman Corporation (with its German joint venture Sasol-Huntsman) is the world’s major producer of maleic anhydride, a key component needed for our paper. Huntsman is infamous for tax evasions, ranking number one on the Toxic 100 Air Polluters Index of the United States, as well as inventing the plastic clam shell food container for Burger King. With every page of paper produced for Migrant Journal, we pay into their bank account. Furthermore, we also support the swindling managers of South-African-based company Sappi Limited, who control the production of our inside paper and were investigated by the European Commission for illegal price fixing. And if this wouldn’t be enough, we found out that we are collaborating with the multinational investment bank Goldman Sachs, who owns Flint Group—the company that produces the ink for Migrant Journal. Among a lot of other disgraceful acts of banking, lobbying and speculation, Goldman Sachs made billions of fraudulent dollars during the financial crisis of 2007/2008.
And here, we end the research of our supply chain—simply because we cannot dive any deeper into the depressing darkness of this black hole. Instead, we want to ponder over the nerve-racking question: How can we ever produce cultural goods ethically in an age of resource scarcity, ecological catastrophes and increasing global inequality?